Skip to content

Discerning Data

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us

DISCERNING DATA

A Faegre Drinker Blog Covering the Latest in Privacy, Cybersecurity and Data Strategy

  • Privacy
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Strategy
  • Disruptionware

$500,000 Settlement for Failure to Comply with Basic HIPAA Compliance Requirements

Share

Advanced Care Hospitalists PL (ACH) and the Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS-OCR) entered into a $500,000 no-fault settlement and two year corrective action plan (CAP) to settle potential violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

ACH has provided contracted internal medicine physicians to Florida-based hospitals and nursing homes since 2005. ACH obtained billing data processing services between November 2011 and June 2012 from an individual who purported to be a representative of Doctor’s First Choice Billings, Inc. (First Choice), a third party billing company. ACH did not enter into a business associate agreement (BAA) agreement with the third party billing company. The individual who provided these services to ACH allegedly used First Choice’s name and website without the billing company’s knowledge or permission.

On February 11, 2014, a Florida hospital notified ACH that patient demographic information, including names, dates of birth, and social security numbers, and some limited clinical information was viewable on First Choice’s website. First Choice quickly reacted and shut its website down on February 12, 2014. ACH identified 400 affected individuals before it filed its breach notification report with HHS-OCR on April 11, 2014, which it later amended to indicate that another 8,855 individuals could have been affected.

HHS-OCR’s investigation revealed that ACH failed to:

1. Enter into a BAA with the individual who purported to work on behalf of First Choice;
2. Enter into a services agreement with the individual who purported to work on behalf of First Choice;
3. Implement any HIPAA Privacy, Security, or Breach Notification rule policies or procedures until April 1, 2014; and
4. Conduct a risk analysis until March 4, 2014.

ACH’s CAP requires it to undertake a widespread adoption of BAAs, enterprise-wide risk analysis, and produce comprehensive policies and procedures to comply with HIPAA.

As a reminder, HIPAA requires a covered entity to obtain satisfactory assurances from its business associate that it will safeguard whatever protected health information (PHI) and electronic protected health information (ePHI) the business associate creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of the covered entity. HIPAA also requires covered entities to implement policies and procedures that comply with HIPAA rules as well as conduct accurate and thorough assessments of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to its ePHI. In this situation, OCR determined that ACH did not obtain such assurances from its business associates or implement any appropriate risk analyses and policies and procedures, and as a result violated the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules.

If you have any comments or questions about this settlement agreement or HIPAA generally, please reach out to any member of the Drinker Biddle Health Care Group.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

About the Author: Sumaya M. Noush

Sumaya Noush counsels health care clients on strategic and operational matters, including transactions, corporate governance and regulatory compliance. View Sumaya's full bio on the Faegre Drinker website.

Receive Email Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE

December 19, 2018
Written by: Sumaya M. Noush
Category: HHS/OCR, HIPAA, Privacy
Tags: HIPAA, privacy

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: FCC Adopts Order Creating a Centralized Reassigned Number Database, Which Could Address Some Robocall Concerns
Next Next post: California AG to Hold Public Forums on CCPA

Search the Blog

Sign Up for Email Alerts

PODCASTS

Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology

©2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT