Skip to content

Discerning Data

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us

DISCERNING DATA

A Faegre Drinker Blog Covering the Latest in Privacy, Cybersecurity and Data Strategy

  • Privacy
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Strategy
  • Disruptionware

CMS Proposed Rule, Rebranding of Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentives Program Shifts Focus to Interoperability and Patient Access

Share

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently released its Proposed Rule that, in major part, rebrands the previously known Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentives Program into the Promoting Interoperability Program. The rebrand shifts the focus of the program to ensure that providers facilitate patient access to their own health data, and  limit the burden on health care providers when it comes to monitoring clinical care using health technology.

The underlying aim of the original EHR Incentives Program was to provide incentive payments to health professionals and hospitals that demonstrate meaningful adoption, implementation, upgrading, or meaningful use of health technology. Under the Proposed Rule, CMS is setting its sights high on data health interoperability and striving to ensure that patients have comprehensive access to their own health data.

Patient Access

As written, the Proposed Rule states that starting in 2019, hospitals will be required to make EHRs available to patients on the same day patients are admitted and released from a hospital.  In relevant part – the Proposed Rule would require a 90-day EHR reporting period for providers already participating in the current EHR Incentive Programs, beginning in 2019 and 2020.  Further, providers would have to transition into using the 2015 edition EHR certified technology (CEHRT) beginning in 2019, as opposed to the 2014 CEHRT currently used, in order to demonstrate meaningful use. The Proposed Rule notes that the functionalities of 2015 CEHRT will increase interoperability and the flow of information between providers and patients.

The 2015 CEHRT criteria contains requirements for systems to demonstrate that it can share and extract files across systems, as well as a requirement that the vendor allow the provider to extract patient data themselves (the previous 2014 CEHRT did not include a requirement that vendors allow providers to  extract data). Further, the 2015 CEHRT contains a new function that supports increased patient access to their health information through email transmission. These criteria, CMS states, will result in increased interoperability between EHR systems. A failure to use such technology could result in a reduction in Medicare reimbursement for a provider.  Notably, the 2015 CEHRT criteria also includes features that are designed to improve the functionality, analysis capability, and quality of electronic Clinical Quality Measures (eCQMs) data.

Clinical Quality Measures

eCQMs use data electronically extracted from electronic health records and/or other health information technology systems to measure the quality of health care provided and use this detailed clinical data to assess the outcomes of treatment provided by health care providers and organizations. The Proposed Rule presents the possibility of removing the following seven eCQMs in which the costs associated with implementation have been deemed to outweigh the benefits:

  1. Primary PCI Received within 90 Minutes of Hospital Arrival (AMI-8a) (adopted at 79 FR 502456)
  2. Home Management Plan of Care Document Given to Patient/Caregiver (CAC-3) (adopted at 79 FR 50243 through 50244)
  3. Median Time from ED Arrival to ED Departure for Admitted ED Patients (NQF #0495) (ED-1) (adopted at 78 FR 50807 through 50710)
  4. Hearing Screening Prior to Hospital Discharge (NQF #1354) (EDHI-1a) (adopted at 79 FR 50242)
  5. Elective Delivery (NQF #0469) (PC-01) (adopted at 78 FR 50807 through 50810)
  6. Stroke Education (STK-08) (adopted at 78 FR 50807 through 50810)
  7. Assessed for Rehabilitation (NQF #0441) (STK-10) (adopted at 78 FR 50807 through 50810).

The Proposed Rule provides additional detail as to why these individual eCQMs were selected for removal. CMS believes that a reduction in the overall number of eCQMs will reduce costs and improve the quality of reported data and allow hospitals flexibility in selecting which eCQMs to report to best reflect their patient populations and support internal quality improvement efforts. As in 2018, hospitals would submit one self-selected calendar quarter of data on four self-selected measures.

Comments on the Proposed Rule will be accepted until June 25, 2018. If you would like support in providing a comment to CMS or have any questions about the Proposed Rule, please reach out to any member of Drinker Biddle’s Health Care Group.

About the Author: Sumaya M. Noush

Sumaya Noush counsels health care clients on strategic and operational matters, including transactions, corporate governance and regulatory compliance. View Sumaya's full bio on the Faegre Drinker website.

About the Author: Daniel Walbright

Subscribe and Receive Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE
May 10, 2018
Written by: Sumaya M. Noush and Daniel Walbright
Category: Health Care
Tags: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Clinical Quality Measures, cms, doctors, EHR, electronic health records, Health Care, health technology, hospitals, interoperability, Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentives Program, patients, Promoting Interoperability Program, providers

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Mobile Phone Maker BLU Products Settles with FTC Resolving Allegations of Lax Data Security Practices
Next Next post: FTC Warns Two Foreign-Based App Developers of Possible COPPA Violations

Search the Blog

Sign Up for Email Alerts

PODCASTS

Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology

©2022 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT