Skip to content

Discerning Data

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us

DISCERNING DATA

A Faegre Drinker Blog Covering the Latest in Privacy, Cybersecurity and Data Strategy

  • Privacy
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Strategy
  • Disruptionware

Data Breach Notification Laws Now Enacted in All 50 States

Share

South Dakota and Alabama are the last of the 50 states to have enacted breach notification laws, along with Washington, D.C., Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. South Dakota became the 49th state to enact a data breach notification law when Governor Dennis Daugaard signed Senate Bill 62 into law on March 21. It goes into effect on July 1, 2018. On March 28, 2018, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed into law Alabama Senate Bill 318, effective May 1, 2018. Below are the parameters of these new data breach notification laws.

South Dakota

The South Dakota law only applies to computerized data and, like many states’ laws, includes an encryption safe harbor in the definition of “breach.” This means that a breach occurs when there is an unauthorized acquisition (versus access) of unencrypted computerized data or encrypted data with the encryption key. As with the majority of other states, the law includes a risk of harm analysis before affected individuals must be notified.

Notice to the South Dakota Attorney General is required if the breach affects more than 250 state residents – joining 24 other state attorneys general that require specific notice of a breach.   Notification to affected state residents must be made within 60 days of the discovery that a breach has occurred, which is longer than most states that establish a specific timeframe. The new law does not create a private right of action, but authorizes the attorney general to both bring criminal prosecutions and seek up to $10,000 per day per violation, along with attorneys’ fees, in civil suits.

Alabama

Alabama’s Data Breach Notification Act of 2018 applies only to electronic data, includes an encryption safe harbor in the definition of “breach,” and incorporates a risk of harm analysis before notice to individuals is required. “Covered entities” is broadly defined to include government entities.

If the number of affected individuals exceeds 100,000, or the cost exceeds $500,000, substitute notice is allowed and requires a conspicuous notice on the covered entity’s website for 30 days, as well as notice in print and broadcast media where individuals reside. Notice to the attorney general is required if the number of affected individuals exceeds 1,000 and must be made as expeditiously as possible or within 45 days of the covered entity’s determination that a breach has occurred.

The Alabama law also requires that the consumer reporting agencies be notified if the incident affects more than 1,000 individuals at a single time. In addition, third-party agents who experience breaches are required to notify the covered entity within 10 days. The attorney general can seek civil penalties of up to $5,000 per day that covered entities fail to comply with the notice provision, and covered entities may be subject to up to $500,000 per breach under the Alabama Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Finally, government entities are required to comply with the notice provisions of the act, but are not subject to the monetary penalties. Instead, the attorney general must provide a report annually to the governor and the leaders of the House and Senate describing the nature of any reported breaches relating to government entities or their agents.

As reported in a blog by Daniel Walbright, 32 state attorneys general have released a letter to Congress  preemption of state data breach and security laws with a draft bill, “Data Acquisition and Technology Accountability and Security Act.”

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Receive Email Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE

April 10, 2018
Written by: Discerning Data Editorial Board
Category: Cybersecurity, Privacy
Tags: data breach, state laws

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Attorneys General Call for Congress to Avoid Possible Federal Preemption of State Data Breach and Security Laws
Next Next post: SEC Freezes $27 Million Related to a Blockchain/Cryptocurrency Acquisition

Search the Blog

Sign Up for Email Alerts

PODCASTS

Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology

©2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT