Skip to content

Discerning Data

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us

DISCERNING DATA

A Faegre Drinker Blog Covering the Latest in Privacy, Cybersecurity and Data Strategy

  • Privacy
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Strategy
  • Disruptionware

Physician Provided PHI to Media When “No Comment” Would Have Sufficed

Share

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced a $125,000 no-fault settlement and two-year corrective action plan with Allergy Associates of Hartford, P.C. (Allergy Associates) stemming from an incident involving a physician who impermissibly released protected health information (PHI) to the media.

In February 2015, a patient of Allergy Associates contacted a television station in Connecticut   about a dispute that had occurred between the patient and a physician at Allergy Associates. The dispute revolved around an allegation that Allergy Associates turned the patient away because she used a service animal. The television station contacted the implicated physician for comment soon thereafter and Allergy Associates’ Privacy Officer instructed the physician to remain silent on the matter. According to the HHS-OCR settlement announcement and Resolution Agreement, the physician ignored the Privacy Officer’s instructions and impermissibly disclosed the PHI of the patient to the television station. As a reminder, the Health Insurance and Portability Act (HIPAA) generally prohibits health care providers from disclosing a patient’s protected health information to media unless either (i) the patient or their personal representative authorizes the disclosure, or (ii) the disclosure fits within a HIPAA exception.

Following the impermissible disclosure, and after HHS notified Allergy Associates that it initiated its investigation, Allergy Associates failed to take any disciplinary action against the physician for this impermissible disclosure or pursue any corrective action following the disclosure. Please note that HIPAA requires a covered entity to have and apply appropriate sanctions against its workforce members who fail to comply with its own privacy policies and procedures or HIPAA’s privacy regulations, and further document such sanctions.

This settlement, announced on November 26, 2018, comes on the heels of three other media-related HHS-OCR settlements that DBR on Data reported on in September involving the disclosure of PHI in the course of filming a television series  at various hospitals in Massachusetts. Together, these recent HHS-OCR enforcement activities reflect HHS-OCR’s watchfulness as health care providers continue to face challenges that accompany increasing traditional and social media presence in daily health care operations.

If you have any questions about this HHS-OCR settlement or HIPAA compliance in general, please contact any member of Drinker Biddle’s Health Care Team.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

About the Author: Sumaya M. Noush

Sumaya Noush counsels health care clients on strategic and operational matters, including transactions, corporate governance and regulatory compliance. View Sumaya's full bio on the Faegre Drinker website.

Receive Email Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE

November 28, 2018
Written by: Sumaya M. Noush
Category: HHS, HHS/OCR, HIPAA, Privacy
Tags: Department of Health and Human Services, disclosure, HHS, HIPAA, media, OCR, personal health information

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: FCC Announces its Agenda and Speakers for its AI and Machine Learning Forum
Next Next post: FTC Commissioners Call for Federal Privacy Legislation and Highlight Lack of Civil Penalty Enforcement in Senate Hearing

Search the Blog

Sign Up for Email Alerts

PODCASTS

Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology

©2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT