Skip to content

Discerning Data

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us

DISCERNING DATA

A Faegre Drinker Blog Covering the Latest in Privacy, Cybersecurity and Data Strategy

  • Privacy
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Strategy
  • Disruptionware

Singapore Taekwondo Federation Fined by Personal Data Protection Commission for Unauthorized Disclosure of Minors’ Information

Share

Singapore’s Personal Data Protection Commission recently found that the Singapore Taekwondo Federation violated Singapore’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) by failing to protect minors’ personal data on its website.  The PDPA was enacted in 2012 to “govern the collection, use and disclosure of personal data by organisations in a manner that recognizes both the right of individuals to protect their personal data and the need of organisations to collect, use or disclose personal data for purposes that a reasonable person would consider appropriate in the circumstances.”

The federation promotes, supports, and develops taekwondo-related activities and programs in Singapore.  On May 30, 2017, a public complaint was lodged against the Commission alleging the unauthorized disclosure of National Registration Identity Card (NRIC) numbers of 782 students who participated in the 2017 Annual Inter-School Taekwondo Championships.  The taekwondo federation had been posting the names and schools of student participants on its website since 2015.  The NRIC numbers were contained in minimized hidden columns within PDF versions of Excel spreadsheets.  Though the columns were not immediately visible, the complainant was able to view the NRIC numbers by copying and pasting the information into another document.

During the Commission’s investigation, the federation acknowledged its process of receiving encrypted Excel spreadsheets containing students’ personal information, rearranging the information and hiding the NRIC numbers, and converting the spreadsheets into PDF form.  The federation admitted that it was not aware of its data protection obligations under the PDPA and had not appointed a data protection officer or implemented a personal data protection policy.

On June 22, 2018, the Commission found that the federation did not take “sufficient steps towards protecting the personal data in its possession” or “prevent the unauthorised disclosure of the personal data.”  The Commission stated that the NRIC numbers constitute “a data attribute that is assigned to an individual for the purposes of identifying the individual and, on its own, identifies an individual.”  Moreover, the Commission noted the greater sensitivities and additional safeguards pertaining to the NRIC numbers in this situation because they belonged to minors less than 21 years old.  The Commission stated that the federation should have at the very least “ensured that its staff in charge of creating, processing and converting the Excel spreadsheets were given proper and regular training to equip them with the knowledge” to correctly convert the spreadsheets into PDF documents while properly protecting the personal data.

As penalty for this disclosure, the federation is required to pay a $30,000 fine, appoint a data protection officer, and establish a data protection policy pursuant to the PDPA.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Receive Email Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE

June 29, 2018
Written by: Discerning Data Editorial Board
Category: Privacy
Tags: minors, Personal Data Protection Act, Personal Data Protection Commission, personal information, Singapore

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Federal IT Modernization Report Recommendations
Next Next post: Final Report on U.S. Government Policies and Public-Private Frameworks to Address Botnets, Security and Resiliency Challenges Released

Search the Blog

Sign Up for Email Alerts

PODCASTS

Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology

©2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT