Skip to content

Discerning Data

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us

DISCERNING DATA

A Faegre Drinker Blog Covering the Latest in Privacy, Cybersecurity and Data Strategy

  • Privacy
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Strategy
  • Disruptionware

FTC Signals Intention to Move Forward to Adopt New Privacy Rules in the Absence of Federal Legislation

Share

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), on a split party vote on August 11, approved an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the Notice) that focuses on potential new rules and requirements that could apply to entities engaged in targeted advertising or other forms of personal information gathering and sharing. Once this Notice is published in the Federal Register, the public will have 60 days to comment on the merits of the proposed new rules. There is also a public forum on the Notice slated to take place on September 8. The FTC’s action comes on the heels of legislative attempts to codify federal privacy protections that have yet to come to fruition.

In a public statement, FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan asserted that the “growing digitization of our economy – coupled with business models that can incentivize endless hoovering up of sensitive user data and a vast expansion of how this data is used – means that potentially unlawful practices may be prevalent. Our goal today is to begin building a robust public record to inform whether the FTC should issue rules to address commercial surveillance and data security practices and what those rules should potentially look like.”

Both Republican Commissioners dissented to the adoption of the Notice, suggesting that the agency would be better served to await the outcome of potential federal legislation than to begin its own complex and lengthy quasi-legislative process. Moreover, on the substance of the Notice itself, Commissioners Wilson and Phillips suggested that its discussion on several topics strayed beyond the scope of enforcement the FTC has taken to date with data brokers and other collectors of personal information and that scope of the Notice itself is so broad as to provide little actual notice of what specific conduct would be regulated or permitted under new rules.

Entities that use data brokers for actionable information, those who use collected information for automated commercial decision making and consumer groups are all likely to be active participants in the FTC’s advanced rulemaking. While it remains to be seen whether the FTC will adopt rules, its activity in this area underscores the perceived need for federal standards enunciating privacy protections for personal information either by means of legislation or via FTC regulation.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

About the Author: Laura Phillips

Laura Phillips leads the firm’s telecommunications & mass media team. She counsels technology entrepreneurs and represents these clients on issues related to the development of new technologies. View Laura's full bio on the Faegre Drinker website.

About the Author: Alicia J. Batts

Alicia Batts has extensive experience representing clients in antitrust matters in a multitude of business sectors. Fortune 500 and other leading companies turn to Alicia for creative solutions to competitive impact concerns raised by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ).

Receive Email Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE

August 15, 2022
Written by: Laura Phillips and Alicia J. Batts
Category: FTC, Privacy

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: UK’s Data Protection Reform Proposals Show Distinct Divergence from EU Rules
Next Next post: What Is the Information Blocking Rule? – Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology Podcast

Search the Blog

Sign Up for Email Alerts

PODCASTS

Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology

©2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT