Skip to content

Discerning Data

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us

DISCERNING DATA

A Faegre Drinker Blog Covering the Latest in Privacy, Cybersecurity and Data Strategy

  • Privacy
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Strategy
  • Disruptionware

FDA Approves Software Application That Alerts Providers of Potential Stroke in Patients

Share

On February 13, 2018 FDA approved a software application with clinical-decision support capability, in this case alerting providers of a potential stroke in patients. The system, “Viz.AI Contact,” is developed by a US/Israeli company named Viz.ai, which uses artificial intelligence and machine deep learning for analyzing medical images.  Earlier in January, this system also received a CE Mark from the European authorities.

Stroke is caused by an interrupted blood supply to the brain; for example, due to a blood vessel’s rupture.  Stroke is among leading causes of mortality and long-term disability in the U.S. and other countries.  The Viz.AI Contact system analyzes brain computed tomography (CT) scans, identifies a suspected large vessel blockage, and sends a text notification to the health care specialist.

To gain regulatory approval, the company submitted results of a retrospective comparison between the decisions of the Viz.AI Contact system and those of two trained neuro-radiologists, based on an analysis of 300 CT scans.  Real-world evidence and information from clinical trials were also used.

Viz.ai describes itself as a “Direct-to-Intervention healthcare company,” and their just-approved system for stroke as their “landmark product.”  Their future plans are unclear at this point.  In principle, however, similar applications seem plausible, as CT scans are ubiquitous in modern medicine. The CT technique uses X-rays to image internal organs and structures, to facilitate diagnoses from dental abscesses to metastatic cancers.

This recent approval aligns with FDA’s previously stated goals of advancing digital health policies and encouraging innovation.  Moreover, going forward, FDA plans to “further reduce the time and cost of market entry of digital health technologies,” according to the 13-February Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD.

For Viz.AI, the agency used a De Novo premarket review pathway, which is reserved for new types of medical devices that are considered low to moderate risk and have no legally marketed predicate device.  Subsequent similar systems, however, may now use the more common FDA process (“510 (k)”), which relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device.  This means that the next system operating on a similar principle (e.g., use of AI and triage software) for a similar purpose (e.g., analyzing computed tomography images) may obtain U.S. regulatory approval based on comparisons to Viz.AI Contact rather than on results of clinical trials or other extensive studies.  The De Novo summary provides further insights into the types of information that the agency may be requesting in support of demonstrating substantial equivalence for a similar system in future 510(k) submissions.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Receive Email Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE

February 23, 2018
Written by: Svetlana Lyapustina
Category: Health Care, Privacy
Tags: artificial intelligence, FDA, Internet of Things

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Involuntary Dissolution Does Not Absolve Business Associate of HIPAA Obligations
Next Next post: Information Injury Workshop Covers Non-Financial Harms Faced By Consumers

Search the Blog

Sign Up for Email Alerts

PODCASTS

Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology

©2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT