Skip to content

Discerning Data

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us

DISCERNING DATA

A Faegre Drinker Blog Covering the Latest in Privacy, Cybersecurity and Data Strategy

  • Privacy
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Strategy
  • Disruptionware

The Devil is in the Definitions for Federal Consumer Data Privacy Safeguards

Share

The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing “Examining Safeguards for Consumer Data Privacy” on September 26, which included testimony from tech industry executives.

Senator John Thune’s opening statement noted that with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) have put the issue of consumer data privacy squarely on the Congress’s doorstep. “The question is no longer whether we need a federal law to protect consumers’ privacy,” he said. “The question is what shape that law should take.”

The witnesses at the hearing were:

• Len Cali – AT&T
• Andrew DeVore – Amazon
• Keith Enright – Google
• Damien Kieran – Twitter
• Guy Tribble – Apple
• Rachel Welch – Charter Communications

Each witness provided an opening statement describing their company’s approach to privacy and outlined, in a general way, their proposals of what federal legislation should look like. Seventeen senators had a short time to ask questions.

The witnesses generally support a comprehensive U.S. privacy law that incorporates principles of transparency and consumer choice and that should include state preemption provisions. All generally agreed that the Federal Trade Commission is the best federal agency to enforce a new law, which presumably it would do through a rulemaking. Although the industry leaders seemed to agree that the FTC should have enough resources for enforcement, there didn’t appear to be consensus on whether the FTC should have more enforcement authority and what it would entail.

Several senators asked questions about the GDPR and CCPA. With respect to GDPR, most of the witnesses indicated that the burden of compliance was significant with one witness stating that “hundreds of years of human time” that has been invested in GDPR compliance. Several witnesses noted that the GDPR compliance obligations will squeeze out the small or middle-sized companies and that only large companies can afford to comply with GDPR. There was little specific discussion about CCPA.

When asked whether any of the companies would exit Europe or California because of the new laws, they all said no. One senator said that it appears that the “devil is in the details” when it comes to supporting a new regulation. When asked which provisions of the GDPR and CCPA should be part of a U.S. law, there was no response.

Given the time constraints of the hearing, the witnesses did not go into specific detail with respect to how personal data should be defined or what constitutes the sale or disclosure or personal data.

There will be at least one more hearing before the Senate committee, which will include testimony from Alastair Mactaggart, the California real estate developer who funded efforts behind the proposed ballot initiative that led to the CCPA, and Andrea Jelinek, the EU’s chief regulator for the GDPR and head of the Austrian Data Protection Authority.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Receive Email Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE

September 28, 2018
Written by: Discerning Data Editorial Board
Category: GDPR, Privacy
Tags: CCPA, data privacy, GDPR, Senate Commerce Committee

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Three Separate OCR Settlements Resulting from Hospital Failures to Obtain Patient Authorization for Use of Protected Health Information Before Filming Television Docuseries
Next Next post: NTIA Seeks Comment on Federal Consumer Data Privacy Approach

Search the Blog

Sign Up for Email Alerts

PODCASTS

Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology

©2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT