Skip to content

Discerning Data

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us

DISCERNING DATA

A Faegre Drinker Blog Covering the Latest in Privacy, Cybersecurity and Data Strategy

  • Privacy
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Strategy
  • Disruptionware

European Union Adopts Adequacy Decision For Safe Data Flows With Japan

Share

On January 23, 2019, the European Commission announced its decision to adopt adequacy status with Japan for transfers of personal data.  Pursuant to the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), this decision will allow personal data to flow freely between the 28 EU countries, three additional European Economic Area member countries (Norway, Liechtenstein, and Iceland), and Japan, without the need for additional data protection safeguards or derogations.  Japan adopted an equivalent decision with the EU on January 22, 2019.  These reciprocal findings of adequacy will create the largest area of safe data flows in the world.

The Commission highlighted the following safeguards that Japan initiated prior to the Commission’s determination of adequacy:

  • Implementation of a set of Supplementary Rules designed to bridge the differences between  EU and Japanese data protection systems, including with respect to the protection of sensitive data, the exercise of individual rights, and the conditions under which EU data can be transferred from Japan to another country (“onward transfers”).  According to the Commission, these Supplementary Rules “will be binding on Japanese companies importing data from the EU and enforceable by the Japanese independent data protection authority (PPC) and courts.”
  • Assurances from the Japanese government to the Commission that any access to EU personal data by Japanese public authorities for criminal law enforcement and national security purposes would be “limited to what is necessary and proportionate and subject to independent oversight and effective redress mechanisms.”
  • Adoption of a complaint-handling mechanism, administered and supervised by the Japanese independent data protection authority, to investigate and resolve complaints from EU citizens regarding access to their personal data by Japanese public authorities.

Implemented in May 2018, the GDPR requires that EU citizens’ personal data be transferred to countries with an adequate data protection status.  Japan joins only 12 other countries – Andorra, Argentina, Canada, Switzerland, Faeroe Islands, Guernsey, Israel, Isle of Man, Jersey, New Zealand, the United States (under the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield), and Uruguay – as providing adequate protection under the EU’s data privacy framework.

The Commission’s adequacy decision will complement the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, which was signed on July 17, 2018, following several years of negotiations between the jurisdictions. The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement will enter into force in February 2019.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Receive Email Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE

January 25, 2019
Written by: Discerning Data Editorial Board
Category: EU, GDPR, International, Privacy
Tags: EU, EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, GDPR, personal data, safe data flow

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: California Attorney General’s Office Gathers Public Opinions Regarding the Implementation of the California Consumer Privacy Act
Next Next post: Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation – Illinois Supreme Court Holds That a Technical Violation of Statutory Biometric Rights is Sufficient to Bring a Claim

Search the Blog

Sign Up for Email Alerts

PODCASTS

Faegre Drinker on Law and Technology

©2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Additional Resources
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT